VertRep

VertRep

Saturday, March 24, 2007

"Canadian port security said too lax"


Seems like no one is happy about Port Security:
Canada is not doing enough to screen cargo containers for potential terror threats or to weed out organized crime activity at its sea and freshwater ports, according to a report on Thursday.

Cruise ship passengers and their luggage should also undergo the same screening used at airports, and vehicles should be searched before they are allowed on large ferries, the Canadian Senate's national security and defense committee said.

The committee has complained before of lax security at Canada's sea and freshwater ports, and accuses the government of using "weasel words" to "create the illusion that something is being done to solve a problem when it isn't."

Not paranoid enough? Then read "Terrorist Warning"


You know, without a baseline to let you know how much of the sort of stuff reported at Terrorist Warning, you could get the impression people are out to harm to their fellow man...

And don't forget the frequently updated Global Incident Map.

Of course, in an entirely different vein is the Weekly World News. Say, have you heard about the "super-cool" Jazz Fusion Reactor? I thought not.

U.S. Southern Command: 'Partnership for the Americas'


Presentation by Adm Stavrididhere:
At US Southern Command - the military organisation focused on the 32 nations and 13 territories of Central America, South America, and the Caribbean - we devote a considerable amount of energy to the study of these challenges and opportunities. We pursue a host of programmes designed to foster security, stability, and goodwill in the region, with the ultimate goal of enabling the spread of true prosperity to the 450 million people living in this part of the Americas.

The key to the future of this great region is understanding - understanding each other, understanding our shared challenges, and understanding the promise of security cooperation for our shared future. When it comes to our philosophy, the SouthernCommand motto directly reflects our approach: "Partnership for the Americas".
And testimony from his recent appearance before the Senate Armed Forces Committee here:
Stavridis was also asked to comment on his assessment of recent developments in Venezuela.

“Historically, Venezuela and the United States have enjoyed a very positive relationship,” he said.

But recently, the admiral said the command has “seen far less cooperation in areas of [USSOUTHCOM] responsibility, virtually no military-to-military cooperation. We see limited cooperation, if at all, in the anti-narcotic front.”

He said he’s “increasingly concerned” about Venezuela’s military buildup, including the purchase of 25 Su-30 advanced Russian fighter jets, 50 advanced attack and transport helicopters and most especially 100,000 AK-103 rifles. He likened the rifle purchase to a proliferation of “weapons of micro-destruction.”

“With that many rifles, they’re going to be moving through that region, perhaps going into the hands of fighters across the border in Colombia. It’s a very great concern,” he said.

The admiral also commented on Venezuela’s discussions to purchase diesel submarines. “It is hard to understand what is the perceived threat in this hemisphere. It´s just difficult to understand why the government of Venezuela would feel the need to purchase that level of arms and I am concerned about the destabilizing effect throughout the region,” he said.

Navies in the "silent war"


As reported in Silent war against terror waged in dangerous waters:
The seizure of 15 British navy personnel Friday was a stark reminder of the unheralded conflict being fought by the United States and its allies on the high seas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula and the Horn of Africa.

After the U.S. invasion of Iraq, patrols of the volatile waterways in the Middle East and East Africa were stepped up. Their targets are human trafficking, drug and oil smuggling, piracy, weapons-running and possible infiltration by terrorists into Somalia and Yemen -- criminal activities that, military leaders fear, provide cover and financial support for international organizations such as al Qaeda.
***
Although Germany and France opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq, both participate in a task force attached to the U.S. 5th Fleet, which takes part in that war from the Persian Gulf. How do the Germans feel about taking part in an open-ended operation so far from the North Atlantic?

"We don't do America's work," said Chief Petty Officer Rebecca Steinhardt, 23, the ship's weapons controller. "Since the 11th of September, there were terrorists found in Germany, so it's everyone's war."

The Bremen's skipper, Capt. Andreas Jedlicka, said intelligence showed that links existed between training camps in Somalia and militant havens in the Arabian Peninsula. "Terroristic activities are not only about the United States," he said.

Scherrer, the Bremen's operations officer, noted that Germany's economy depends on global trade, particularly shipping from Asia -- the vast majority of which passes through the task force's area. In his eyes, the Bremen is defending Germany and the sea lanes it relies on, not merely falling in with America's global war on terror.
Oh, yeah. Those sea lanes.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Someone in India is worried about protecting their sea lanes



As set out here:
With Chinese footprints in the international waters around India growing at a rapid pace, coupled with the ever-increasing threats posed by terrorists, pirates and drug smugglers, New Delhi needs to fast-track its plans to bolster the military infrastructure and force-levels in the strategically-located Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

The military build-up in the archipelago will not only counter covert and overt Chinese moves in the region but also go a long way in ensuring the security of the sea lanes converging towards the Malacca Strait, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes with around 70,000 ships sailing through it every year.

Moreover, it will also provide a strong security cover to India's 600,000 sq km of Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) spread out in this region, which is around 30% of India's total EEZ of 2.01 million sq km. This becomes all the important since it is expected that the energy exploration blocs in the region will lead to huge gas finds in the years to come.
***
Though sources say there are plans to eventually base a division-level force (around 15,000 troops), a fighter squadron and some major warships here after increasing the support and maintenance infrastructure in the 572-island cluster, the going has been slow.

Apart from the two main runways at Port Blair and Car Nicobar and airstrips at Diglipur and Campbell Bay, moves are finally afoot to construct more airstrips at Kamorta and Little Andaman.

"Even the IAF chief recently said this is the place where the future action will take place. There are plans to include fighters, bigger ships and more Army troops here but we are developing ANC in bits and pieces," said ANC chief Air Marshal P P Raj Kumar, ahead of defence minister A K Antony's first visit to the islands on Saturday.

While Indian Jaguars, Sukhoi-30MKIs and other fighter jets, as also large destroyers and frigates, often operate in the region as part of training exercises, India should ensure that at least some major military assets are permanently based in these islands, which are as far as 1,200 km from the country's eastern coast.

In sharp contrast, Myanmar's Coco Islands, where the Chinese have some presence, are barely 42 km away towards the north. Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries are also much closer to the islands than the Indian mainland.

"The response time from the mainland to threats in this area will obviously be slow. It makes prudent sense to boost force-levels here to protect India's geo-political and economic interests. ANC, after all, is the last military outpost of India," said a senior officer.
More on sea lanes here.

UPDATE: More here. Earlier posts on Indian base on Nicobar here. And here. And more info on Chinese presence on Coco Island here.

And a report that says the Coco Island reports are false.

Iran seizes Brit sailors



Iran, for the second time a couple of years, has grabbed some UK sailors as set out here:
Fifteen British Navy personnel have been captured at gunpoint by Iranian forces, the Ministry of Defence says.

The men were seized at 1030 local time when they boarded a boat in the Gulf, off the coast of Iraq, which they suspected was smuggling cars.

The Royal Navy said the men who were on a routine patrol in Iraqi waters, were understood to be unharmed.
Counterterrorism Blog has questions.

Everyone on the non-Iranian side seems pretty sure the Brits were in Iraqi waters. I wonder why the Iranian forces were allowed into those waters to make the grab?

UPDATE: THe Counterterrrorism Blog sees wheels within wheels.

A The Jawa Report: Video : A Gathering of Eagles

Fanfare for the Common Man? The Jawa Report: Video : A Gathering of Eagles.



By Sout al Kuffar.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Radical environmental pirates


Calling it as he sees it, Damian Wyld takes on the "Sea Shepards" in Radical environmentalism: sabotage and piracy on the high seas. Excerpt:
The innocuous-sounding Sea Shepherds have waged a violent campaign of sabotage and operated a pirate vessel within Australian waters. And their backers include Hollywood A-list celebrities.

Saving the whales. Hardly a radical notion these days. It’s probably also a fair call that Australian public opinion stands against whaling, especially when carried out within our territorial waters.

But what should the public think of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, a radical environmentalist movement making frequent media appearances for disrupting Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean?
***
A recent collision between the Japanese sighting vessel Kaiko Maru and Sea Shepherd ship Robert Hunter left each side blaming the other, but it prompted Watson to threaten a Japanese whaler, the Nisshin Maru, with “a steel enema”. “They would have to go back to Tokyo with us sticking out of their rear end,” said Watson.

That Watson is willing to sacrifice his own ship, the Farley Mowat, to do this should come as no surprise. The Farley Mowat’s Canadian registration was cancelled last year and a short-lived flag of convenience from Belize was also revoked in January, leaving the ship a pirate vessel, now apparently low on fuel.

Furthermore, the Sea Shepherds have quite a history of using this tactic. They have reportedly sunk at least 10 ships already off Iceland, Norway, Spain, Portugal, South Africa and the Canary Islands. Many of these were said to have been rammed by concrete-reinforced steel hulls, complete with an attachment known as the “can opener”.
***
That these “pirates” and “eco-terrorists” exist in 2007 is one thing. But what truly is strange is, first, the fact that governments, media and others treat them seriously; and, second, that they receive support from many high-profile figures.
Last year I posted about these eco-terrorists and noted a comment by Watson:
Property damage is not really violence, Watson says. Violence, he insists, is inflicting harm on a living creature, something he says has never happened in his campaigns.
And as I said at the time, he'd sing a different tune if it was his ship that was sunk alongside the pier.

If he wants to act like a pirate, then a pirate's fate should await him. And if, as contended in the Wyld piece, the Board of Directors for his enterprise includes well-heeled Hollywood types who provide funding for this dangerous nonsense, I wonder why they are not be pursued in court for funding terrorism?

And it is not that I hold a favorable view of the whalers, but wonder what other groups Watson and his supporters might target to force their world view on the rest of us...

Yemen: Another sectarian war?


As set out here, an effort to quell an movement to install an "Iranian-style" government in Yemen:
In Saada province, 240 kilometers north of the capital Sana'a, nearly 700 people have been killed as fighting reignited in late January between the Yemeni army and a Zaidi Shi'ite insurgent group called Al Shabab Al Moumin (the Youthful Believers) - formed by now-deceased tribal chief Hussein Badr al-Din al-Houthi - after the rebels threatened to kill members of a small Jewish community in Saada if they did not leave the country within 10 days.
***
The current conflict represents the third government crackdown since 2004 in Saada province, where the anti-government Shi'ite insurgency started out as a small domestic protest against Yemeni policy. Rebel clerics have denounced the government's ties with the United States and demanded an end to its gradual shift to Western-style social and democratic reforms.
***
The Hezbollah-style rebel group was formed three years ago by Shi'ite cleric Hussein Badr al-Din al-Houthi, who was killed in September 2004 while fighting under the slogan: "God the Greatest ... Death to America and Israel ...Victory for Islam and Muslims."

The government is determined to crush the uprising. But many observers worry that it may not be wholly able to overcome Houthi's group, which aims to install an Iranian-style Islamic theocracy.

"They refused all offers by the government to disarm and form a political party to live in peace," said Abdullah al-Faqih, a professor at Sana'a University. "I think the rebels have this time lost all grounds for negotiations with the government."
***
Military sources say Houthi's three-year fight against the government has cost the country an estimated US$800 million, with extensive damage to property.

The government, however, faces other unresolved problems in that many extreme religious groups refuse to operate within a democratic system that they see as invalid, explained Haidar: "Al-Houthi's group was trying to copy Iraq's sectarian strife in Yemen."

Sunni Muslims are a majority in Yemen, a nation of 19 million. It is the ancestral homeland of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. However, Houthi and his supporters are not linked to al-Qaeda.
As always, Jane at Armies of Liberation has more on Yemen on an on-going basis.

Navy: National Security trumps environmentalist courtroom discovery needs

The Navy is saying "No!" to litigation discovery demands made by environmental groups suing the Navy with respect to Navy sonar and the whales and other marine mammals, as set out in Navy Takes Legal Steps to Safeguard Classified Information.

This bounces the issue to the judge to decide if the Navy's assertion of "state secrets" is appropriate.

I hope the Navy takes the issue as far as the plaintiffs want to push it.

I note that "state secrets'," "trade secrets," and various privileges are often invoked in pretrial discovery and often upheld.

Piracy updates


From ONI's Worldwide Threat to Shipping (to 14 March 07):
H. INDIAN OCEAN-EAST AFRICA:
.
1. TANZANIA: Ship boarded, robbed 26 Feb, at 0315 local time in position
06:37.4N - 039:32.0E, drifting off Dar es Salaam port. Ten pirates armed with long
knives boarded the ship from the bow. The pirates tied up the duty AB and asked
for ship's store keys. The duty officer spotted the pirates and raised the alarm and the crew mustered. The pirates escaped with the ship's stores. No injuries to crew. The port control was informed; however, no action was taken (IMB).
.
2. SOMALIA: UN-chartered aid cargo ship hijacked 25 Feb, at 0603 UTC
in position 11:50N - 051:35E, off the northeastern coast near Bargal. Suspected
Somali pirates armed with AK-47 rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers
intercepted the M/V ROZEN with a speedboat hijacking the M/V ROZEN along
with its crew of six Sri Lankans and six Kenyans, after delivering 1,800 tons of
food aid to the towns of Bosasso and Berbera in the Somali region of Puntland.
The vessel was empty at the time of attack. Following the hijacking, the pirates
anchored the vessel in the waters near the town of Bargal. Three Somali police
speedboats surrounded the M/V ROZEN and a U.S. military vessel was also
patrolling the area on 27 Feb, to monitor the situation. Later on 27 Feb, conflicting reporting of either four or six suspected pirates were arrested by the police after going ashore in the town of Bargal to get food and other items to take back aboard the M/V ROZEN. Four heavily armed pirates still have control of the vessel and the 12 hostages. As of 28 Feb, the M/V ROZEN moved south and has anchored six miles off the coast of the Puntland region. All the glass of the bridge is damaged following a heavy exchange of gunfire between the Puntland Coast Guards and the pirates. All crew members are said to be safe. As of 07 Mar, reports vary that between four or six hijackers remain in control of the M/V ROZEN. The vessel is reportedly anchored off Gara’ad, which is close to the border of Puntland off the central region of Somalia. Kenyan shipping agents are continuing negotiations to secure the releaseof the crew members and the WFP chartered ship, although there has not been a major breakthrough as of 13 Mar. The pirates have demanded a ransom for the release of the vessel and all crewmembers who are said to be in good health.
(IMB, UPI, LM).
***
6. SRI LANKA: Sri Lankan Navy destroys LTTE rebel boats, killing 15,
27 Feb, evening timeframe 360km Northeast of the capital in the Pulmoddai area.
The two boats destroyed were among a flotilla of 14 boats moving off the Pulmoddai
area. At least 15 rebels were believed to be killed in the attack while two sailors were injured (LM: indiaenews.com).
.
7. SRI LANKA: Sri Lankan Navy destroys suspicious boat 28 Feb, 0830 local
time, 180nm off Dondra Point. The suspicious vessel did not have a flag, name, or
identification markings. The Navy suspecting it to be a LTTE boat engaged in
smuggling activities was ordered to stop by firing several warning shots for identification and research. The suspicious boat fired back instead and continued to proceed further South at increasing speeds. The Navy reacted by firing at the boat which exploded instantly amidst a cloud of smoke and fire indicating it was carrying weapons and explosives for the LTTE terrorists, however the identity of the vessel has yet to be established (LM: nationalsecurity.lk, tamilnet.com).
.
8 SRI LANKA: The Sri Lankan Coast Guard destroyed a seized LTTE boat
20 Feb, Chennai. The Coast Guard seized the LTTE boat on 13 Feb; at mid sea
after finding that the gap between the fibre sheets of the boat was packed with
gunpowder and could explode at any time. The boat was towed by the Coast
Guard to open water to be blown up. Five persons on board were arrested. During
questioning it was said that the boat was packed with ammunition, which could
be blown up anytime using a hidden switch which was found after a thorough search
of the ship (LM: The Hindu).
.
9 SRI LANKA: The Sri Lankan Navy destroyed two suspected LTTE boats
15 Feb, Colombo. The boats were hauling hundreds of thousands of steel balls
often used in bombs. Four rebel fighters were believed to be killed. A Navy
spokesman reported that divers retrieved 28 bags filled with the steel balls from
the sunken boats. Also found was an automatic rifle, ammunition and a satellite
phone from the boats. No immediate comment on the sea battle was available
from the LTTE (AP).
.
From ICC Commercial Crime Services Weekly PIracy Report (to 20 March 07):
12.03.2007 1305 LT in position 18:27.4N – 038:17.8E, Red Sea
Pirates in a wooden boat armed with AK-47s approached a research ship underway conducting surveying operations and fired upon the ship. A Sudanese navy vessel came to its assistance and detained the pirates. After 20 minutes the pirates were released. No injuries to crew.

11.03.2007 1929 LT in position 18:29.02N – 038:19.26E, Red Sea.
15 pirates in a 12 metre wooden boat armed with AK-47s approached a research ship underway conducting surveying operations and fired upon the bridge of the ship . The ship activated SSAS and contacted Sudan authorities and managed to move from that area. No injuries to the crew.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Buck Sargent Hits the Center RIng


I've been fumbling with a way to express what Buck Sargent does so well here in a nice little rant about, ultimately, BDS:
But I'm starting to get the sense it's no longer just the cuckoo for cocopuff crazies who are getting down with the sickness. Take this blurb from an Associated Press story covering the latest antiwar march on Washington:

Retired Marine Jeff Carroll, 47, an electrician in Milton, Del., held a sign saying: "Proud of our soldiers, ashamed of our president." Carroll said he served in Lebanon when the Marine barracks was bombed in a deadly attack in 1983, and thinks the U.S. should be focusing on Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden instead of Iraq. "We're fighting the wrong country."
Well shouldn't we have started with the Lebanese then? (If this is to be believed, it may actually come to that). But I'd like to assume Jeff to be an otherwise rational fellow, and as things currently stand the reason why not is precisely the same reason we can't possibly be "fighting the wrong country." We're not fighting a country at all. Thanks to us, Iraq and Afghanistan both now have friendly representative governments that furnish (somewhat) uniformed armies that are fighting alongside us. Precisely what it is we're still battling is a viral ideological movement that has no borders and no territory other than where we allow it to operate due to our own political vacillation. But what I really cannot believe is that there are still so many Americans out there that fail to grasp this crucial distinction.
Amen. Sarge, amen.

Follow-up: Civil Air Patrol and the now found Scout


As a follow-on to a couple of posts concerning (1) the Civil Air Patrol and (2) a missing Boy Scout. The Civil Air Patrol played a role in recovering the Scout, as set out
here:
Civil Air Patrol's North Carolina Wing flew in specially trained canine teams used to assist in the search for Michael Auberry, a 12-year-old Boy Scout found the afternoon of March 20 after missing for four days in Stone Mountain State Park.

The Air Force Rescue Coordination Center had alerted the North Carolina Wing to provide requested support and assistance in the search for Auberry. Willkes County, N.C., authorities contacted the North Carolina Emergency Operations Center and the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety asking for CAP's assistance in transporting the needed dog teams and their equipment from Southport, N.C.

Three CAP aircraft and aircrews departed from Raleigh and Harnett counties early March 20, flew to Southport in Brunswick County, picked up the dogs, their handlers and equipment, and flew them directly to Wilkes County. The CAP aircraft arrived in Wilkes County about 9:30 a.m.
You know, in case you missed that connection in the news coverage.

BZ, CAP!

More on the Strait of Malacca toll


Found here:
Following the proposal last week to establish a voluntary scheme to enable the industry to help contribute directly to the cost of maintaining navigational safety in the straits, the shipping community flatly rejected any mandatory notion and even reacted coolly to the voluntary one.

The novel idea hit upon by Japan's philanthropic Nippon Foundation - virtually the sole third party contributor to navigational safety, having contributed more than US$120 million over the last 35 years - is to create a voluntary fund based on charging vessels according to their deadweight tonnage.

At one US cent per tonne, the fund would raise about US$40 million annually. To put this into perspective, a typical containership of 5,000 TEUs would be in the neighbourhood of 66,000 deadweight tonnes, which at US$0.01 per tonne would amount to a mere US$660.

Let's face it, this is peanuts. It's only slightly more than two tonnes of bunker fuel and significantly less than the S$5,600 this same vessel would pay in port dues to the Maritime & Port Authority of Singapore for a port call of less than 24 hours.

Shipping lines would probably pass this on to shippers anyway, meaning that consumers ultimately would pick up the cost, which by the time you broke it down to that bottle of wine you purchased at the supermarket, you would be paying probably less than one additional cent.
But, as the piece goes on to nore, the real issue is how to "bell the cat" and find a way to impose fees that actually works. Background here.

Environmental impact: Port of L.A. can't grow infrastructure fast enough to meet demand for services





As set out here,
The port complex of Los Angeles-Long Beach is the gateway for 70 percent of US imports and to accommodate the more than 40 million TEUs cascading into its terminals in a few years, the ports must expand both capacity and productivity. Rail operators will also be required to invest heavily in infrastructure, although they have already said there will be no investment without guaranteed returns.
Handling more containers per acre is being addressed with some urgency, but it is unlikely the ports along the West Coast of North America will achieve the moves found routinely at Asia terminals any time soon.
Extensive and lengthy environmental deliberations and impact assessments are another delaying factor in the expansion of port capacity. LA-Long Beach may be the US gateway, but it has the most enlightened green regulations in the world and the people in the sprawling city are the immediate beneficiaries.
An admirable achievement, but what about trade? China will increase the number of containers being exported through its terminals by 42 percent to 160 million boxes in three years. We reckon about 35 million of those TEUs will steam across the Pacific Ocean bound for Southern California.
Intermodal shortcomings will keep the pipeline choked. To have any hope of getting their products into the US and on to shelves, shippers will simply have to spread their cargo flows throughout the year.
We predict the traditional peak season on both the transpacific and Asia-Europe will disappear under a flood of traffic all year round. Inventories will increase as Christmas goods are imported early to avoid delays and supply chain costs will rise.
We understand that many US cargo owners have already revised their outsourcing strategies and dusted off old Mexico plans, and this probably explains why Mexican port authorities have been showing up regularly at recent port conferences. Mexico's Pacific ports recorded container-handling growth of 42 percent in 2006, mainly through Manzanillo.
So, an inability to expand efficiently and realize economies of scale, will cause a level of inefficiency that will result in greater expenses to shippers and buyers in the distribution chain, ultimately resulting in higher prices to the consumer and likely in more total pollution than if the Port of LA-Long Beach were allowed to expand...added to which will be the loss of jobs that could have been grown in the U.S.

Where is the agency of government planning that ought to be taking the long view of such matters?

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Monday, March 19, 2007

Going into the woods? Take a pocket survival kit


A lost Boy Scout prompts thoughts of survival equipment that those of us who occasionally venture off the beaten path should have with us at such times. Even if on an organized camping trip with a group.

Experience tells us that it's very easy to wander off, perhaps chasing a butterfly and end up losing one's way. Worse, you could fall down and get hurt, or suffer some other form of injury that will mean that you will have to be rescued, and that the rescuers will have to come to you.

I am not a mountain man, but I have some experience in the woods and my suggestions are those of a practical nature. Most of what I suggest is light weight and could be put into a small fanny pack. I should note that I firmly believe in the "buddy system" for scouts and others in the woods.

I also believe in letting people know where I am headed if take off a a walk and how long I expect to be gone. If I am not back when expected, I expect them to be able to follow my trail and find me.

That being said, people do wander off alone and without telling people where they are headed. If I were a Scoutmaster or troop leader, I would now make sure each scout prepared an emergency "pocket survival kit." Something they can, literally, stuff into a pocket or a fanny pack. My suggested content? Here:

1. A loud whistle;
2. Space blanket, with training in proper use;
3. Pocket knife;
4. Plastic garbage bag (can be used as a jacket) or poncho;
5. Small LED flasher;
6. Orange vest
7. A small signal mirror.

You know, water and food are good, but the main concern I have is to be able to signal my location. The whistle, mirror and LED flasher serve that purpose. Using the space blanket, poncho should allow a person to fend off hypothermia for a couple of days.

Oh, and lots of training. Tools without knowledge of their use are useless.

By the way, REI has a nice little kit in a bottle for your car or backpack here.

UPDATE: Good news: Missing Scout is found.

Maritime Monday 51 at Fred Fry International

In his first anniversary Maritime Monday, Fred covers a whole lotta ground - er- water in Maritime Monday 51. For example, he reminds of the "Bigger Boat Rule" though he calls it the "Law of Gross Tonnage" and has a great heavy weather photo and much more. Go on, go look- you know you want to...

Happy Anniversary, Fred!

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Sunday Ship History: The Anti-Submarine Warriors of the Civil Air Patrol

Last week, in a comment to a Sunday Ship History post on the Coast Guard Auxiliary, Robert Langland briefly mentioned the "other" Auxiliary, the Air Force's Civil Air Patrol. Connection with the Maritime Services? As set out below, the CAP was very active in anti-submarine patrols off the U.S. coasts during WWII - sinking a couple of U-boats...

It all began with one man's idea generated by events in Europe just before the U.S. shooting part of WWII started...
In the mid to late 1930’s, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan created an alliance called the Axis, and were taking over much of Europe, North Africa and Indochina. Their actions were beginning to threaten America’s allies and vital interests. A by-product of the Axis’ aggressions was the stifling of civil aviation in conquered countries. Also, in those countries not yet threatened by Axis power, civil aircraft flight was either drastically curtailed or eliminated as authorities realized the need to better control air traffic through restriction to military flights only.
During the period 1938-41, United States civilian aircraft pilots, aviation mechanics and aviation enthusiasts became increasingly concerned about the international situation. They began to understand – as many Americans did – that if the Axis powers were even marginally successful in their plans for conquests, America would be forced to intervene. If so, they concluded that the government would most probably severely limit aviation in an attempt to reduce the risk of sabotage.
These air-minded Americans realized that the United States – and the aviation community – would be better suited if civil aviation could be put to use when hostilities opened instead of being restricted by the government. During that period, there were approximately 25,000 light aircraft, 128,000 certified pilots, and over 14,000 aircraft mechanics in America. Fearing these repercussions, many of these aviation enthusiasts searched for ways to both serve their country and preserve civil aviation’s strength. While many pilots and mechanics entered the Royal Air Force or the Royal Canadian Air Force to “get on with it,” others joined the US armed
services. Those who could not join a military service because of age, physical condition or for other reasons still had the desire to help. They were prepared to endorse any plan whereby they and their aircraft could be put to use when the time came in defense of the nation.

The concept of a national civil air patrol was first envisaged in 1938 when Mr. Gill Robb Wilson, a noted aviation writer of the time, returned from a writing assignment in Germany. While there, he noticed Germany’s aggressive intentions first-hand. Upon his return to his home state of New Jersey, he reported his findings to Governor Edison and pleaded that New Jersey organize and use its civil air fleet as an augmentive force for the war that he was convinced would come.
Not only did Mr. Wilson go to the governor of New Jersey, he got others on board:
Wilson then convinced New York mayor (and National Civil Defense Chief) Fiorello La Guardia of the need for a civilian air defense organization. The new Civil Air Patrol was born on December 1, 1941, just days before the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

The CAP insignia, a red three-bladed propeller in the Civil Defense white-triangle-in-blue-circle, began appearing on private aircraft everywhere. (The red markings were later deleted for aircraft in combat areas to prevent confusion with enemy insignia.) CAP initially planned only on liaison flying and interdiction of infiltrators on the East Coast and the southern border, but CAP’s mission grew when German submarines began to prey on American ships.
Wait? Submarines?
After Nazi U-boats began disrupting deliveries of gasoline and oil to the United States, and threatening the transport of vital war supplies being rushed to Europe, the new organization found a new mission--coastal patrols and submarine spotting.

Sponsored by oil companies such as Sunoco (Sun Oil) and civic organizations, 40,000 people from all walks of life volunteered to serve in civilian coastal patrols and the Civil Air Patrol. Private pilots supplied their own aircraft and equipment, but their operating expenses often exceeded the $8 per day flight reimbursement provided by the government. Civic groups held fundraisers and established "Sink-a-Sub Clubs" to provide financial assistance to the coastal patrol and Civil Air Patrol pilots.
Seems the idea was that the CAP would patrol the littoral and report any sightings to the Army Air Corps and a war plane was to be dispatched to follow up on the sighting. See here.


However, one day things changed because of "the one that got away"...
About the middle of May, 1942, "Doc" Rinker and his observer, Tom Manning, spotted a Nazi submarine stuck in the sand in shallow water just offshore from Cape Canaveral, Florida. "Doc" frantically radioed our West Palm Beach base to contact any military base that had a bomber with bombs, and dispatch it immediately. West Palm Beach, a Ferry Command base, didn't have any bombers with bombs. "Ike" Vermillya, our West Palm Beach base commander, got on the phone and called Banana River Naval Air Station and Tampa. Neither had a plane with bombs available at the time. The United States was truly caught short and unprepared. Most armed military aircraft were in Europe and Africa, fighting the Nazi Axis, or in the Pacific fighting the Japanese.

A bomber with depth charges was finally located at the Jacksonville Naval Air Station and dispatched to Cape Canaveral. But several hours had elapsed since the Nazi sub had been located, and by the time the Navy bomber arrived, the sub had freed itself from the sand in the shallow water and had disappeared in to the deep sea.

Everyone was furious to think that the trapped enemy "water snake" had escaped simply because of a lack of fire-power.
Shortly thereafter, ways were found to jury rig bomb cradles onto the little aircraft and the CAP was in the ASW and SAR business*.
By 1943, Civil Air Patrol coastal patrols had flown 244,600 hours totaling 24 million miles (38.6 million kilometers), summoning help for 91 ships in distress and aiding in the rescue of 363 survivors of submarine attacks. CAP patrols spotted 173 enemy submarines, attacking 57 with bombs or depth charges, damaging 10 and sinking two. In recognition of its effectiveness, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an Executive Order on April 29, 1943, establishing the Civil Air Patrol as the auxiliary of the U.S. Army Air Forces. At the time of its transfer to the AAF, the Civil Air Patrol ranks had swelled to more than 75,000 volunteers.
The offshore work was not easy:
Submarine patrol was hazardous duty. Few of the pilots had any overwater flying experience, but their patrol areas lay from 20 to 100 miles offshore. They flew at 300 feet, too low to use parachutes. Patrols often were carried out in weather below Army and Navy minimums. Their light planes were not designed to survive ditching, which could be fatal, especially in winter. Because of these perils, female CAP pilots were not allowed to volunteer for submarine duty, but they flew in other capacities.
As the U.S. ramped up for war, the mission of the CAP changed again:
Largely in reaction to the Civil Air Patrol's activities, enemy submarine close-in operations along the East Coast were withdrawn and, on August 31, 1943, Civil Air Patrol coastal patrols were ordered to stand down (cease operations). In the ultimate compliment, a Nazi submariner later admitted that the U-boats were pulled back "because of those damned little red and yellow airplanes" of the Civil Air Patrol.

Its coastal patrol mission no longer needed, Civil Air Patrol members, both men and women, continued to support the war effort--guarding airfields, towing aerial targets, flying military courier and liaison missions, and of course, air search and rescue. By war's end, Civil Air Patrol volunteer pilots had flown over 500,000 hours, but many also paid the ultimate price--more than 90 CAP aircraft were lost and 64 of its volunteer members died in their country's service.

In 1946, President Harry S Truman, in acknowledgement of the Civil Air Patrol's dedication and achievements, signed a bill granting the Civil Air Patrol a national charter. The U.S. Air Force was established as a separate armed service in 1947 and the Civil Air Patrol soon followed, designated as the Air Force's permanent civilian auxiliary in May 1948. On July 1, 1976, the Civil Air Patrol was transferred to U.S. Air Forceís Headquarters Command, and placed under the command of Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama.

By the 1960s and 1970s, Civil Air Patrol pilots were flying more than 75 percent of all search and rescue missions in the United States, and that primary mission continues to this day. CAP members are always ready to serve in any capacity, performing such vital roles as delivering critical supplies, establishing command posts, and providing radio communications during natural disasters and emergencies.

The promotion of air power to the public, as well as providing aerospace education and training for its adult and youth members, remains of paramount importance to the Civil Air Patrol as it begins a new century of providing volunteer services to benefit the public good. Those "little red and yellow airplanes" and their civilian crews remain one of the military's best investments.
Of course, whether the CAP chased away the German subs all by themselves or perhaps as part of other factors (convoys, better escorts, more military aircraft for patrols) is probablly a bar argument that will never be resolved. One could even quibble about whether one or two U-boats wer sunk by the CAP... but why?

These were brave men who rose to meet the need of their country at a very dangerous time and who did a damned fine job for virtually no money and very little glory. In many ways, it is a classic American tale rising to a challenge in an innovative fashion.

In the post-9/11 world, the CAP is still with us, performing valuable missions:
CAP's emergency services include air and ground search and rescue, disaster relief, counterdrug, and an increasing role in homeland security. Its members fly more than 95 percent of the inland search and rescue missions directed by the Air Force Rescue and Coordination Center at Langley Air Force Base, Va. The Civil Air Patrol flew more than 3,000 search and rescue missions and was credited with saving 73 lives in 2005.
***
CAP provides extensive support to the nation's Gulf coast following natural disasters. During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005, CAP serviced dozens of locations across the region – more than 1,500 CAP members volunteered to provide support ranging from aircraft missions such as search and rescue, transportation of critical personnel and supplies, and aerial imagery of flood damaged areas for civil authorities to ground team missions such as house to house searching of neighborhoods and passing out emergency supplies. In total, the CAP flew nearly 1,000 aircraft missions in support of the hurricane relief efforts.
The CAP is moving into Homeland Defense duties as recognized by a unique benefit:
Due to CAP's expanding role in the 21st century to include increased homeland security work, Congress in February 2003 amended the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to make members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety Officer death benefits.

Under this bill, Civil Air Patrol members who lose their lives in the line of duty will become eligible for the same federal death benefit provided to other public safety personnel. The bill, entitled the Civil Air Patrol Homeland Security Benefits Act (H.R. 3681)applies to the members of CAP who lose their lives or become permanently disabled while engaged in active service in support of operational missions of the U.S. Air Force.


You might be interested in the National Museum of the Civil Air Patrol on the Web.



*Gen Hap Arnold's version of arming the CAP:
From "Global Missions", by H.H. Arnold, Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York 1947
Pages 301-302

"One time, a C.A.P. pilot saw a submarine cruising inside the shallow water area, but the sub paid no attention to the harmless little plane overhead. The pilot said he flew low enough to throw a rock or a wrench and hit the submarine, yet the U-boat in shallow water went moving along just like a cabin cruiser. When it was ready, the sub went out through a gap in the shoals and sank a ship.

I asked Gill Wilson if he thought the C.A.P. pilots, dressed in civilian clothes and having no military status, would object to carrying bombs on their puddle-jumpers. As usual, Wilson was enthusiastic and asked, "Where do we get them?"

Accordingly, I had special bomb racks built at one of our depots bomb racks that could be attached to these small planes in a very short time. We also built a cheap bombsight, and thereafter most of the C.A.P. planes carried bombs-fifty pounders the pilots could drop on the submarines, knowing full well that if they were taken prisoner in civilian clothes, they would not be considered part of our armed forces, but guerillas.


UPDATE: As provided in the first comment, here's a link to the CAPBlog.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Turf war -Disappearing islands? Singapore and Indonesia at odds


As reported in Singapore accused of land grab as islands disappear by boatload:
With more than 17,000 islands — from the jungly expanses of Borneo and Sumatra to unnamed rocks jutting out of the sea — you may think that Indonesia would not mind if a few of them went missing. But the huge South-East Asian nation has become caught up in a furious dispute with Singapore, its tiny neighbour, which is accused of literally making off with its territory.

Indonesia has banned the export of sand and imposed strict controls on shipments of gravel, after fears that its islands were being loaded on to ships and carried away to Singapore. In its thirst for building materials and landfill to reclaim new territory from the sea, Indonesians allege, Singapore has been stealing the land beneath their feet.

The dispute reached a climax this week after 24 tugs and barges, carrying granite chips, were intercepted by the Indonesian authorities as they sailed home to Singapore. Jakarta announced that future exports would be allowed only if the granite could be certified as environmentally friendly.
***
“Some of these islands are reduced to islets, and could even disappear below the surface,” Hendropriyono, Indonesia’s former intelligence chief, has said. “This could theoretically lead to a cartographic zero-sum game in which Singapore’s gain could be at Indonesia’s territorial loss.”