VertRep

VertRep
Showing posts with label Poland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poland. Show all posts

Thursday, October 09, 2014

Energy Wars: Fracking Our Way Ahead

America's not so secret new weapon, discussed again at The American Interest "Shale Boom Has America Sitting Pretty"
By lessening our dependence on foreign sources of oil and gas, the shale boom has given us more options abroad, and in some cases . . . has given America more clout in diplomatic standoffs.
Almost all of this "shale boom" has occurred, by the way, by private companies working their "magic" on private property - in many cases with local or regional opposition to this development.

Interesting look at the U.S. development of its resources from Aljazeera "American power and the fracking boom: What impact will America's oil and gas boom from fracking have on US power and global geopolitics?":
Fracking is giving rise to a new energy abundance in the United States that has major implications for American policy in the Middle East and the debate over climate change. Over the past five years, daily oil production in the US increased 3.7 million barrels, while US net imports of oil dropped 44 percent. A revolutionary technique to tap into oil and gas reserves by drilling horizontally into underground shale formations and using liquids pumped at high pressure to open cracks in the rock, fracking is reshaping the contours of American power.
***
For the past 35 years, securing access to Persian Gulf oil and protecting the shipping lanes to keep it flowing has been a central tenet of American military policy. It is known as the Carter doctrine because President Jimmy Carter first enunciated the commitment in his 1980 State of the Union address.

Historian and author Andrew Bacevich hopes that the shale oil and gas boom from fracking will cause a strategic rethinking of the Carter Doctrine in the United States. "What the new energy regime could do would be to make it clear that the United States does have choices and one of those choices will be to lower our profile in the Middle East more broadly and in the Persian Gulf specifically," he says.
***
According to Jeppe Kofod, a member of the European Parliament and representative from Denmark to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, about one-third of US military spending, or about $200bn a year, can be linked to efforts to keep oil flowing.
***
. . . President Barack Obama and administration officials emphasise that the US commitment to safeguarding access to Middle Eastern oil will remain strong despite America’s shrinking reliance on imports from the region. In a speech at the United Nations last year, Obama said that the US is prepared to use military force, “to ensure the free flow of energy from the region to the world. Although America is steadily reducing our own dependence on imported oil, the world still depends on the region's energy supply."
***
Anti-fracking activists are trying to prevent the construction of terminals and pipelines needed to transport and export natural gas and oil. Robbie Cross, a member of a local group trying to stop fracking in Pennsylvania, is clear about the rationale. "After you frack it has got to go somewhere," he says. "If we don’t have ways of moving it, selling it, distributing it, it’s not going to work."
***
Richardson and other proponents of shale exports argue that they can be used as effective instruments of American power to counter the Russians in Europe. The Continent relies on Russia for 30 percent of its gas supplies, and half transits via the Ukraine. Some countries like Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic get 70 to 100 percent of their gas from Russia. Hungary’s ambassador–at-large for energy security, Anita Orbán, argues that American exports of natural gas to Europe can help diversify supplies and undermine Russia’s energy leverage there even if the flow does not begin for a few years. (emphasis added)
The impact of fracking on China is discussed in the country that uses the greatest percentage of coal in the world, China, in this Atlantic article, America's Fracking Boom Comes to China: Deep inside Beijing's campaign to wean the country off coal .

What the EIA says:
Most of China's proven shale gas resources reside in the Sichuan and Tarim basins in the southern and western regions and in the northern and northeastern basins. EIA estimates from its most recent report on shale oil and gas resources that China's technically recoverable shale gas reserves are 1,115 Tcf, the largest shale gas reserves in the world.
***
China's NOCs are in discussion with several IOCs for partnering on potential shale gas projects in order to gain necessary technical skills and investment for developing these geologically challenging resources. CNPC and Shell signed the first PSC for the Fushun-Yonghchuan block of shale gas in the Sichuan Basin in March 2012. Shell also has partnered with Sinopec and CNOOC on two other shale gas plays. After investing $950 million between 2011 and 2013 on shale gas exploration in China, Shell plans to spend another $1 billion each year for the next five years to develop these resources. Sinopec is working with Chevron and ConocoPhillips to explore shale gas resources in the Qiannan and Sichuan basins, respectively. On the reverse side, Chinese NOCs have been actively investing in shale oil and gas plays in North America to gain technical expertise in this arena. (NOC=National Oil Company, IOC= International Oil Company)

It's interesting that people who have previously argued that we should not fight "wars for oil" in our own national interest are willing (1) to commit our national forces and dollars to possibly fighting "wars for oil" for the interests of other countries and (2) that people who who are opposed to U.S. fracking on environmental grounds seem to be totally okay with the status quo of pushing environmental damage off to those second and third world countries who are resource rich but not in the protesters back yards - and condemning others in the world to be dependent on the whims of leaders in Russia and other undemocratic countries.

Given the huge amount of pollution created by the use of coal by China (about 50% of the world's use) - see China's coal emissions responsible for 'quarter of a million premature deaths', it is to the benefit of the entire world that China be given all the assistance it needs to wean itself from coal and to develop its access to those much cleaner burning natural gas reservoirs.

It also behooves Europe and Japan that the U.S., Canada and Mexico develop LNG export facilities to allow the export of natural gas to offset the Russian and Iranian power in using the "oil and gas weapon" against Europe.

The U.S. government should be encouraging U.S. companies to help Poland to explore its shale gas reserves as an offset to the Russians. While the estimated levels of Polish shale gas are fluctuating, there is gas there and it is both Polish and European interests to develop it.

It's not just the U.S. that has the potential to be "sitting pretty" as a result of the the shale boom.

Sunday, August 07, 2011

Shale Gas: Who Objects to Poland's Exploration and Development?

 For some background, you might want to review Shale Gas and U.S. National Security and the links therein. We'll be talking about this during Midrats today at 5pm Eastern.

Buried in the Rice report is an interesting projection that Europe outside of Russia has shale gas and that the country with the highest projected level of shale gas is Poland - estimated to 120 trillion cubic feet of this gas. This is about 55% of the total estimate for Europe.

This is also a threat to the leverage that Russia hoped to invoke as Europe's largest supplier of gas.
Russia made no secret about its desire to leverage its position and create a cartel of gas producers -- a kind of latter day OPEC.
Poland - it's always Poland for Russia, isn't it? - Poland has gas - perhaps lots of shale gas. Russia's OPEC-style price fixing cartel will fail if Poland develops its own resources, especially in conjunction with development of U.S. gas shale.

And Poland is moving to develop its gas shale - with Chevron among others:

In an area becoming a new hotbed of shale natural gas exploration activity, oilfield services firm Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) has been awarded an integrated services contract from supermajor Chevron for shale natural gas exploration in Poland.
Work on Chevron Polska's initial shale gas exploration drilling program is expected to begin in the fourth quarter and the contract award is for three years, with extension opportunities. Chevron was awarded licenses to explore for unconventional gas resources in the area in December 2009.
The plan calls for Halliburton to provide services including drilling services, mud logging, cementing, coiled tubing, slickline services, well testing, completion and hydraulic fracturing. Halliburton will support the project with project management services.
In June 2010, the company announced it had also acquired rights to explore for natural gas in the Grabowiec concession, located in southeastern Poland.
Present in Poland for more than 15 years, Halliburton performed the first-ever shale hydraulic fracturing operation in Poland for PGNiG in August 2010.
The Voice of Ameria reports "Shale Gas in Poland Sparks Hopes of Wealth, Energy Security":
The rush for shale gas in Poland is attracting some of the world’s biggest energy companies, giving the country hopes of energy security and strengthening ties with the United States.

Recent finds in northern Poland appear to confirm what experts have suspected for years - that Poland has Europe’s largest reserves of shale gas.  The news promises to encourage what has become a feeding frenzy of major gas companies and Polish hopes of energy independence from Russia.

***Poprawa says it will be several years before anyone knows exactly how much gas Poland has, and at least a decade before large-scale production can begin.  But in the mean time, exploration concessions have been granted to some of the biggest energy companies in the world.

“We have on our market real majors, the biggest companies globally," he said.  "We have here Exxon, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Total - this is kind of unique, really.  This place a couple of years ago was empty.  Now everybody from the world comes here to make their exploration.”

Of course,suddenly there are voices deriding this ambition of the Poles, as noted in
Resistance to Poland’s Shale Gas Exploration Plans Emerging:
Interest groups that want to block production of gas from shale rock will lobby at the European Union for rules that would make shale gas output unprofitable, a Polish member of the European Parliament said.

“In the fall, we expect more informational activity to encourage legislative work against shale gas,” Pawel Kowal told a press conference. “It’s not possible, for political reasons, to introduce a pan-EU ban on shale gas. But it’s possible to introduce regulations that would make it unprofitable.”

Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has called shale gas a “great opportunity” for Poland. The unconventional gas industry, while still in its infancy in Poland, could create thousands of jobs and, eventually, generate export revenue. If it turns out to be economically viable to extract, it may free Poland from dependence on Russian natural gas supplies.

Environmentalists in several countries are pushing to restrict hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” The technology involves injecting water, sand and chemicals into porous shale rock to release the gas trapped inside the rock. Critics say fracking contaminates ground water.

The U.K. government in July rejected calls for tough new controls on the technology. France in June became the first country to ban it completely.

Mr. Kowal, in 2006-2007 a deputy foreign minister in the conservative cabinet of Jaroslaw Kaczynski, said Poland should take steps to prevent rules that would derail Warsaw’s plans for shale gas.

“Compared to other sources of energy, extracting shale gas isn’t particularly dangerous,” he said. “But lobbying against it may come from various sources. Disinformation will lead to objections in local communities.”

Russia’s OAO Gazprom has called shale gas “a bubble” and “a danger to drinking water.”
So, who could be behind this bad-mouthing of Polish energy independence? Follow the money that will be lost to Poland's (and the rest of Europe's) current suppliers and you'll have an answer.

Stay tuned to see how this unfolds.

Geopolitics. Oh, by the way, Poland isn't the only place that has gas shale: