VertRep

VertRep

Friday, April 18, 2008

Iran: Supplying Gaza with Weapons from the Sea?


Iran appears to be running a weapon smuggling operation into Gaza using the old ploy of dropping waterproof containers from ships, according to this:
ran has stepped up its efforts to smuggle weapons into the Gaza Strip by using floatable devices that it drops near the waters off the Gaza coast to be picked up by Palestinian fisherman, senior defense officials have told The Jerusalem Post.
[Navy ship catches...]

Navy ship catches Palestinians trying to smuggle explosives into Gaza.
Photo: IDF
Slideshow: Pictures of the week

According to defense officials, Iran is now sending rockets and other advanced weaponry to Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip by sea as well as via tunnels dug under the Philadelphi Corridor and connecting the Sinai peninsula with Rafah.

Officials said that the Navy is doing a fairly effective job in curbing the smuggling by sea, but that there are some shipments Israeli forces did not succeed in intercepting.

"They throw the weapons overboard in waterproof, sealed tubes which then float into the Gaza waters and are picked up by fishermen," one official said. "Sometimes Navy boats intercept them and sometimes they get through."

In recent months, the IDF has noticed an increase in Iranian-made weaponry in the Gaza Strip, including rockets and mortars. Terror groups in Gaza recently were equipped by Teheran with two different types of mortar shells made in Iran - one 120 mm with a range of 10 kilometers like a Kassam rocket and another with a range of six kilometers. Defense officials told the Post that in recent weeks thousands of mortars have been smuggled into Gaza.
***
In addition to providing weaponry, Iran is also training Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists, who have used the periodic openings at the Rafah Crossing with Egypt, as well as the collapse of the border with Egypt in January, to travel to Iran and train there in terror and guerrilla warfare.

Officials said the weapons could take several routes from Iran to Egypt. One possibility is that the weapons are taken by boat from Iran to Egypt and then are smuggled into Gaza through tunnels or thrown into the waters off the coast and near the border.

Another possible route is that the weapons are transferred by Iran to Syria, and then to Lebanon, where Hizbullah ships them by boat to Egypt.

A branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards - called the Quds (Jerusalem) Force - is believed to be responsible for overseas operations, such as training Hizbullah and Palestinian terrorists and providing them with weapons.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Iran's Army Day Air Show



Two hundred aircraft were shown it is claimed. Also, Ahmadinejad says Iran is the "Iran is the most powerful and independent nation in the world." Which sort of ignores about a dozen other states that could take Iran to school. More here:
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday proclaimed Iran as the "most powerful nation" on earth as the country's air force showed off its prowess at a time of mounting tension with the West.

"Iran is the most powerful and independent nation in the world," Ahmadinejad told a military parade outside Tehran marking the Islamic republic's annual Army Day, reaffirming one of his favoured slogans.

Ahmadinejad said all the branches of the armed forces would react forcefully in response to any attack against Iran's soil and boasted that no one would dare to launch a strike on the country.

"The army, the Revolutionary Guards and the Basij (militia) will resist with force and coordination and respond strongly to the slightest aggression," he said.

"I am proud to announce today that the Iranian nation's power is of an extent that no major power can dare jeopardise the security and interests of the Iranian nation."




To mark the occasion, dozens of fighter jets and other aircraft flew over the parade ground in a bid to show the power of the air force, which has struggled for years under the effects of US sanctions.

Among them were US-made F4 and F-5 fighter jets whose construction goes back to the 1960s and 1970s when shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi went on a massive military spending spree.

Also shown were several Saegheh fighter jets which Iran says is a entirely home-produced model but Western experts classify as a derivative of the F-5.
***
Among the weapons on display at the military parade was Iran's longer range Shahab-3 missile, whose range includes Israel and even the fringes of Europe.

The model shown had a "baby bottle" nose for extra-dynamic efficiency and was labelled "Ghadr-1" although it was clearly a Shahab-3.

A lorry carrying other missiles also carried the slogan "Death to Israel" while while "Death to America" had been written on another vehicle.
Photos from here.

I do have suggestion for the Iranian forces - they should replace their current identification markings with something like the nearby picture.

By the way, a single US aircraft carrier carries about 85 aircraft. The U.S. Navy has about 3500 aircraft and in total the U.S. military has about 18,000 aircraft.

Just saying.

UPDATE: Oh goodie! Iranian trolls!

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Psst... got a deal for you -- need a "Mobile Coastal Defence System?"


Find a need and fill it, I always say. And some enterprising groups seems to see a need for a Mobile Coastal Defence System. Might meet your budget, too:
For the cost of one traditional type multi-role ship, the MCDS SHIP can equip a country with a whole fleet of multi-purpose base units which can when appropriately fitted out, deter even the most determined aggressor.
I think the helicopters are sold separately.

This will fill freight forwarders with confidence

allAfrica.com: Nigeria: Shady Deals Bane of Freight Forwarding
Prince John Okechukwu Emeka, in his key note address said, "the practice of freight forwarding in Nigeria is characterized by lack of professional standards, shoddy service delivery to clients, shady deals and other unwholesome practices.
The Prince was calling for improvements, of course, but still...

Attacks on ships increase in some areas, not in others


Here's the headline from the International Herald Tribune: Global pirate attacks increase. The headline is inaccurate.
Pirate attacks rose worldwide in the first quarter of the year, with Nigeria overtaking Indonesia as the country worst plagued by sea bandits, a global maritime watchdog said Wednesday.

Seafarers suffered 49 attacks between January and March around the world, up 20 percent from the 41 recorded in the same period last year, the International Maritime Bureau said in a report by its piracy reporting center in Malaysia.

Nigeria ranked as the No. 1 hotspot amid a lack of effective law enforcement, with its 10 reported attacks — mostly off its main city of Lagos — accounting for one-fifth of the global total, the London-based bureau said.

Myriad armed groups roam the Niger Delta, where violence has slashed oil production and helped propel oil prices to new highs. Nigeria produces about 2.1 million barrels of oil a day, the largest output in Africa.

"Violence in the waters off Nigeria is spiraling out of control," the report said, adding that the true number of incidents could be even higher because many attacks in the oil sector are believed to go unreported.

"It should not take a crisis leading to deaths, bombs and the withdrawal of services by shipping companies before the (Nigerian) government is forced to act," the bureau added.

India and the Gulf of Aden off the north coast of Somalia tied for second place among pirate-troubled territories, with both reporting five incidents apiece. Those in India were low-key attacks aimed at theft, while the Gulf of Aden was prone to hijackings.
***
Other countries recording attacks in the first quarter included Tanzania with four, and the Philippines, Bangladesh, Peru, Angola, Ghana and Mozambique with two each.
So, instead of a "global" increase" in piracy, what we see is an increase in violent acts against ships in the territorial waters of one country - Nigeria.

This is true even taking into account that the IMB includes as "piracy" things like someone climbing up an anchor chain and stealing supplies while a ship is in port.*

Perhaps I am just quibbling, but I do not see a surge in pirate vessels running amok on the high seas. The evidence is that, and this is not much of a surprise, Nigeria is a law enforcement and military mess.

UPDATE: IMB Piracy maps for 2007 and first quarter 2008:




See a pattern of "global piracy?" If so, let me know.

* For example, here's a reported incident of "piracy" from the ICC CCS latest piracy report:
08.04.2008: 0247 LT: Dar es Salaam anchorage no. 6, Tanzania.
Anti piracy watchman sighted one robber near the boson store, on a container ship at anchor. On sighting the watchman, the robber jumped overboard and escaped in a waiting boat. Alarm raised. Investigations indicated duty watch keepers had abandoned their stations to look into a noise they had heard, allowing the robber to access the ship unnoticed. Ship’s stores were found stolen.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea defines piracy as:
Article 101. Definition of piracy

Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

(a) any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:

(i) on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or air-craft;

(ii) against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State..,







UPDATE: Nigeria is getting some help in training to patrol their waters, as set out here:
A detachment of the United States (US) Navy led by Captain John Nowell yesterday arrived the country to train its Nigerian counterpart on the operational technicalities of some High Speed Vessels (HSV) expected to arrive Nigeria soon

The vessels are to be fitted with communication and radar equipment. Sources said the vessels were being ordered to meet the challenging needs of the menace of Niger Delta militancy as well as provide adequate security for the oil rich Gulf of Guinea.

Already, the Chief of Naval Staff, (CNS) Vice Admiral Ganiu Adekeye left the country weekend for Singapore, Malaysia and Australia to inspect the extent of works on some platforms and armoured-built helicopters being manufactured for the Nigerian Navy. The Flag Officer (FOC) commanding Western Naval command, Real Admiral Ishaya Ibrahim who received the US Navy entourage yesterday at the Nigerian Navy Ship (NNS) Beecroft Apapa, described the gesture as timely.

He stressed that the US had always been of immense assistance to Nigeria adding that the three day training could not have come at a better time. He assured that “the national maritime environment would now be better secured after the training and delivery of the expected vessels”.

Continuing, the naval boss said, “you know how much we have gone through in providing security for the gulf of guinea particularly in our own area and you know the resources of the gulf of guinea attracts a lot of international concern. More so, personnel of most countries especially those of our white brothers you know have at various instance been abducted in Niger Delta; these equipment are to enhance our capacity to cope with the demanded security and protection of these activities in our waters.”
It's a product of the African Partnership Station.

Sea Piracy: France calls for international action vs piracy off Somalia


Flush with success in getting its hostages back from the small group of Somali pirates holding them, France now suggests international action to protect a shipping lane:
France has called on the international community for a unified action against piracy, after French military secured the release of 30 hostages from a luxury yacht off the lawless Somali coast.

"The international community must mobilize for a determined fight against acts of piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia," French Foreign and European Affairs Minister Bernard Kouchner said in a statement released by the French embassy in Manila Wednesday.

Kouchner stressed the significance of ensuring security in the Arabian Sea, saying humanitarian ships pass through the area. He said France has initiated Operation Alycon to escort ships from the World Food Program.

France “considers it necessary to go further, especially at the United Nations,” he said. “Discussions have started in New York with our partners to move forward on this."
A simple escort and convoy system or prepositioned ships monitoring the Gulf of Aden area near Somalia could reduce piracy attacks.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Latest ICC CCS Piracy Report (to 14 April 08)

The latest ICC Commercial Crime Services (to 14 Apr 08) is here. Highlights:
-13.04.2008: 0205 LT: 03:13N – 105:26E, Off Pulau Mangkai, Indonesia. 12 pirates, in a speedboat, armed with guns, swords and iron bars approached a bulk carrier underway. Master raised alarm, crew directed fire hoses and SSAS activated. Pirates boarded the ship and stole crew personal belongings, ship's cash and property. After 50 minutes, they left the ship. No injuries to crew except minor bruises. Ships in vicinity alerted.

-13.04.2008: 0355 LT: 03:16.18N - 105:26.68E, off Pulau Mangkai, Indonesia. Pirates armed with long knives in a speedboat boarded a product tanker underway. They stole crew personal belongings and ship's property and escaped. No injuries.

-12.04.2008: 0511 UTC: 14:33.6N - 050:32.2E, Gulf of Aden. Two suspicious crafts doing 17 knots approached a container ship underway. Master took evasive manoeuvres and increased speed to outrun the crafts. Both crafts had six to seven persons onboard. No weapons sighted. There were several other small boats in the vicinity; however, there was no indication that these boats were associated with the two suspect crafts.

Totten on Iraq’s Meanest City

Must read: Hope for Iraq’s Meanest City by Michael J. Totten, City Journal Spring 2008.

Somali Pirates




NY Times "The Lede" blog does the Somali pirates and some others in Pirate Whack-a-Mole on the High Seas. Comments are fun, too.

Some people seem to not understand that acts of piracy within another nation's territorial waters is not "high seas" piracy but rather a local law enforcement problem - sea robbery or simple kidnapping. Somalia, since it lacks a real government presents a special case in how local pirates, who are carrying out their predatory acts on the high seas and then running for protection of Somali sovereign waters, where there is no threat from local police or military. Certainly the French had no problem with the concept of "hot pursuit" into those waters and the adjacent land and can argue, based on comments of various local "officials" that they had permission to take the action they did.

Imagine the uproar if the U.S. had done the same thing...

More video of pirate capture here.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Sure, it's always like this at sea...


Sailors assigned to the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) enjoy a clear night from the bow of the ship during a pause in flight operations. Lincoln and embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 2 are on a scheduled seven-month deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class James R. Evans


Click on the picture for a bigger view.

Making History the Hard Way

Probably not the opening paragraph foreseen by the developers of the Gwadar Port when they started work, but what they got here:
And the port is certainly making history. This is perhaps the first port in the annals of the history of port development which could not receive the first commercial ship specifically chartered to use the port on its inauguration. Somebody just forgot to check the draft of the ship against the depth available at the port. The ship had to be partially unloaded at the anchorage to MV Hyderabad, engaged from PNSC, before the ship was able to enter the port.
Heh.

What Cooperation Brings: "Malacca Straits pirate-free last year due to joint patrols"


The Straits of Malacca, notorious pirate grounds, set a record last year - they were "pirate-free"
The strategic Malacca Straits was pirate-free last year due to joint maritime and air patrols with neighbours Indonesia and Singapore, Malaysia's deputy airforce chief said Sunday.

The maritime corridor, which handles 30 percent of all sea transport globally, was prone to attacks in the 1990s but joint action in the last few years has reduced piracy to zero, deputy airforce chief Bashir abu Bakar told state news agency Bernama.

"From January to late December 2007, we recorded zero percent pirate attacks in the Malacca Straits and also recorded a reduction in pirate attacks in the waterways of Sabah and Sarawak (on Borneo Island)," he told Bernama.

"Maritime and air patrols carried out with Indonesia and Singapore through the 'Eyes in the Sky' programme introduced two years ago have worked in reducing acts of violence and robbery in the straits," he added.

Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore all border the key waterway and carry out numerous joint patrols in the area.
Nice to have a success story to report.

Monday Reading

Xformed's Monday Maritime Matters featuring VADM Aaron Merrill and the ship that bore his name.

Fred Fry's Maritime Monday 106 over at gCaptain, with photos of some German ships and a veritable sea related linkfest!

Canada gets tough with anti-sealing"pirates"


Canada apparently has had enough of the self-righteous Sea Shepherds and their self-proclaimed "lawless" ways, a demonstrated here:
An anti-sealing group says seized ship logs and GPS tracking records can prove that Canadian officials ventured into international waters when they boarded the group's vessel and arrested crew members in a dramatic police offensive on the weekend.

The Saturday boarding of the Farley Mowat provoked a storm of accusations between Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn and the activists over whether Canada was within its rights to intercept them.
***
Paul Watson, head of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, said Canadian authorities entered international waters to seize the Farley Mowat, which is registered in the Netherlands. He called the boarding by armed RCMP officers in the Cabot Strait both an act of piracy and an act of war.

"We're a Dutch-registered vessel in international waters with a Dutch captain, Swedish first officer and European crew, and we were boarded by Canada. That's an act of war."

He said the ship's logs and GPS records - seized along with the vessel by Canadian authorities - prove the ship never strayed into Canada's 12-nautical-mile territorial limit.

"We have it actually recorded on our GPS, which of course is in the hands of the government," Mr. Watson said in an interview. "But they'll have to produce it. The evidence is there. They can't destroy evidence."

But Mr. Hearn reiterated the Department of Fisheries and Oceans' position that the vessel was seized in national waters, after requests for it to report to a Canadian port were ignored.

"We're sick and tired of simply waving at these people as they come do what they want, break our laws, leave our water," Mr. Hearn told CTV's Question Period yesterday. "From now on, if they want to play that game, we'll play ours."

Given the high tempers and the Farley Mowat's refusal to follow regulations, Mr. Hearn said he was concerned lives were in danger. "If someone had gotten shot, if someone had gotten killed, who'd be to blame? I would - 'Why didn't you act?' So I acted."
***
The charges relate to a March 30 incident in which the vessel Farley Mowat allegedly went within six metres of several sealing vessels that reportedly had at least one man on the ice floes nearby.

The Farley Mowat had already drawn the attention of Canadian authorities by that point. It had not applied for an observer license, which would have allowed it to go within 10 metres of the seal hunt, and upon arriving at Canadian waters had refused to communicate with Transport Canada, according to the DFO.

On April 5, the vessel's captain and first officer were charged over the March 30 incident - a charge that carries a fine of $100,000 and up to one year in jail. Over the next several days, according to the DFO, the Farley Mowat passed back and forth into Canadian waters, and refused to respond when it was ordered into port. Mr. Hearn is on record warning Mr. Watson that the boat would be boarded at sea if he did not comply. ***
Mr. Watson said the ship did not heed Canada's warnings because "we don't take orders from Canada." He followed Dutch rules, he said.
***
Ottawa says the interception occurred in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in Canadian waters.

Professor William Tetley, a professor of maritime law at McGill University in Montreal, said he believes Canada was within its legal rights to board the vessel in the Gulf of St. Lawrence or the Cabot Strait.

"These are Canadian waters," he said. "They [the Farley Mowat] would have the right of free and innocent passage through there, but if they committed a crime two weeks before, they're still subject to arrest."
I'll bet the Dutch are just raring to go to war with Canada over this matter. Sea Shepherd's Watson selective application of the law is just one of the things that makes his ships a special collection of jerks.

More here:
Canada's fisheries minister defended the arrest of an anti-seal-hunt vessel Saturday, and dismissed the crew members as "money-sucking manipulators."
***
Watson said the raid would backfire on Canada.

"By arresting us -- a European-registered vessel, a European crew -- in this way, that pretty much ensures the bill banning seal products in Europe will be passed," he told media.

"They did exactly what we thought they might do, but I didn't think would be stupid enough to do."

The minister had little time for the protesters.

"They are a bunch of money-sucking manipulators," said Hearn, "and their sole aim is to try to suck as much money out of the pockets of people who really don't know what's going on."

Saturday's raid stemmed from a high-seas confrontation between the Farley Mowat and sealers near Cape Breton on March 30. Sealer Shane Briand said the Mowat endangered the lives of his crew when it came close to them about 60 kilometres off Cape Breton.

That resulted in the charges laid against the vessel's captain, Alexander Cornelissen, and first officer, Peter Hammarstedt.
More fun reading here. Sea Shepherd press release here. Photo their ship Farley Mowat from their site. You might note the pirate flag on the bow.

UPDATE: Other seal attackers that the "Sea Shepherds" will not take on:


UPDATE2: More name-calling, this time from the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador:
But Williams said Watson — who earlier this month described sealers as "sadistic baby-killers" — deserves no sympathy.

"Ever since I've been aware of him, I've always considered Paul Watson to be, you know, a vile, disgusting excuse for a human being," Williams told CBC News Sunday, as Watson was arriving in Nova Scotia to help bail out the skipper and first officer of the ship.

"I think what a lot of people don't realize is that this man is a terrorist, in fact, you know, to come out with the insensitive remarks, for example, that he came out with a few weeks ago, when these sealers lost their lives and he put their lives below animal lives," Williams said.

Watson sparked an uproar earlier this month when he said that while the death of four Quebec sealers was a tragedy, "the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of seal pups is an even greater tragedy."

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Sunday Ship History: Swimming Trucks

It's WWII. You load a ship with all kinds of goods needed by troops to fight a war and you send that ship off to some remote location where there are no piers, no roads, no ports in the conventional sense. How, you ask, can we sustain our men in the field if we can't get their supplies to them?

Or, as the question is posed by the U.S. Army Transportation Museum here:
In early 1942, ships sat waiting to discharge cargo at foreign ports, sometimes for months, due to lack of port facilities. Ships waited for barges, barges waited for trucks, and trucks waited for trains.

Smaller landing craft were being built by the hundreds as quickly as possible to accomplish this mission. Planners soon found the need to deliver high priority cargo, such as ammunition and water, directly to troops fighting inland off the invasion beaches.
Great minds went to work and came up with the amphibious truck -better known as an "amphibious 2-1/2 ton truck" or DUKW (pronounced "duck")("DUKW" was not an acronym, but rather a code - D = built in 1942;
U = amphibious 2-1/2 ton truck;K = front wheel drive;W = rear wheel drive).

The DUKWs became Army vehicles:
The US Navy, responsible for the operation of all boats and ships, simply did not have enough men to train and operate all the various landing craft rolling off assembly lines.

In early 1942, the Navy requested that the Army train and man some landing craft and all of the DUKWs. Initially, this mission was assigned to the Corps of Engineers. The First Engineer Amphibian Command was established early in the summer of 1942.
After training, groups of these engineers and their odd vehicles were sent to the war zones, where the DUKWs proved very valuable. In the words of Samuel Eliot Morison in The Two-Ocean War (p. 249), these amphibious trucks solved several problems, as in the invasion of Sicily:
According to Thucydides, the Greeks who invaded Syracuse in 413 B.C. had most to fear from the Sicilian cavalry, against which for want of a Landing Ship Horse, their only defense was archery. Enemy tanks, the modern cavalry, are now the bane of amphibious landings. In order prevent their working havoc on the GIs it was necessary to land our own tanks and antitank guns with or immediately after the assault troops. That was the main function of the LST and LCT. These craft were supposed to be able to ground on a beach and lower their ramps, over which tanks, guns and vehicles could roll ashore. The LCI beached and then lowered bow gangways, not unlike he "brows" of a Greek bireme, for infantry to land without boating or swimming. Unfortunately, most of the Sicilian beaches were protected by sand bars with enough water to float a landing craft but not an LST. The dukw, an amphibious truck which could carry 25 troops or 2-12 tons of cargo, swim in the water and roll over the land and required only one driver, also made it European debut in HUSKY (NB E1: "HUSKY" was the code word for the invasion of Sicily). The great advantage of the dukw was its ability to carry supplies from a ships to an inland dump without handling at the water's edge.
DUKWs earned their stripes in the Pacific, too, landing at Kwajalein and on other islands, always proving their worth. In the Philippines, DUKWs were invaluable.

Not that they didn't have some occasional problems, as Morison notes in describing the Normandy landings on D-Day, June 6, 1944 (p.402-403):
Once the assault started, landing and beaching craft crews were completely on their own...For two hours after the beachmaster suspended landings, about 50 LCTs and LCIs milled about looking for gaps in the obstacles. Two young skippers then broke the stalemate. Lieutenant 9jg) S. W. Brinker USNR crashed LCT-30 through and beached, her automatic weapons blazing at an enemy strongpoint, which shot her so that she had to be abandoned; but her vehicles got ashore. Lieutenant E. B. Koehler USNR followed with LCI-554 but managed to retract after landing his passengers; and after this example the shoreward movement was never interrupted.

Most of the artillery scheduled to land between 0800 and 0900 was boated in dukws, which were unable to cope with the choppy sea. Only five made it to the beach; hence only one Army battery managed to get into action on D-day. But the place of the drowned artillery was proudly taken by the 5-inch guns of the support destroyers. At 0950 Admiral Bryant called to all gunfire support ships over the TBS: "Get on them, Men! Get on them! They are raising hell with the men on the beach and we can;t have any more of that. We must stop it!" Magnificently they complied..."Without that gunfire," wrote the chief of staff of the 1st Division to Admiral Hall, "we positively could not have crossed the beaches."
No fault of the DUKWs, they were not designed to operate under such conditions. More on the D-day DUKWs here, which contains this great story:
One DUKW set off a mine at sea, and survived. The Admiral sent a signal to the commanding officer; I am aware of the many and varied duties which your DUKWs so efficiently perform, but until this morning I did not realise that minesweeping was one of them. If the crew of the DUKW report at Navy House they will receive the customary award the Admiralty makes to anyone who sweeps a mine. This turned out to be a bottle of scotch. The inevitable result was that DUKWs tended to meander in search of mines!'
That site also posts the following photo of King George VI disembarking from "The Royal DUKW."

Eventually, in Europe, DUKWs moved tons of cargo:
Between June 6 1944 and May 8 1945, DUKWs moved 5,050,000 tons of the 15,750,000 tons unloaded by the allies in Europe during the war.
DUKWs also crossed the Rhine:
The DUKWs were used for one last amphibious operation in Europe -- the famous Rhine River crossing in Germany, at the end of March 1945. During this operation, 370 DUKWs were used to move men and supplies.
Perhaps proof of their value is best represented by their numbers:
By the end of World War II, a total of 21, 147 DUKWs had been built. The Army had organized 70 Amphibious Truck Companies and assigned over 12,829 soldiers to operate and maintain them.
Army DUKWs saw action in Korea, too, landing at Inchon and Pusan.

Of course, there were the occasional odd DUKWs like this "Dukws Radio Beach Landing Vehicle" found here, but without further detail. One assumes it was an amphibious radio truck used for command purposes.

The Marine Corps also had DUKW companies, as set out here. The Marines, too, enjoyed the benefits of these swimming trucks:
During a five-day period of stormy weather, which caused LCVPs to broach on the beaches and Amtracs to swamp or capsize in huge surf and become uncontrollable in heavy seas, DUKWs were the only means able to bring supplies ashore, enabling Tinian units to continue fighting.

The hybrids carved their niche in Marine Corps annals in the Marianas, including Guam. By mistake, Second DUKW landed 14th Marine howitzers on Saipan earlier than scheduled, reputedly in the third wave. Having artillery support ashore during the invasion's early stages proved of such benefit that the Marine Corps thereafter scheduled artillery to land earlier than previously thought practical.

The DUKW's ability to board and debark without assistance via way of an LST's ramp enabled the ship to anchor offshore, thereby reducing reef and beach congestion and lessened the danger of enemy fire on ship and personnel. Furthermore, the hybrid's ability to cross coral reefs and sandy beaches and then proceed inland to wherever supplies were needed saved what would otherwise have been countless man-hours of handling supplies. The DUKW's versatility forestalled the necessity to bring heavy transport vehicles ashore during early stages of invasions, further reducing island and beach congestion.

DUKW crews learned to think of their marvelous vehicles as lifesavers*. In addition to providing forward units the means with which to fight, each trip for a load of battle goods entailed quick delivery of Marine casualties to offshore ships for better medical care.

Iwo Jima was another test for the DUKW. As in the Marianas, it proved its mettle by moving artillery and supplies ashore, where it turned out to be the only wheeled vehicle that could move freely on Iwo's treacherous surface. Here too, Marine DUKW'ers carried a halo over their heads because, just as in the Marianas, losses were miraculously light. Landing on Iwo Jima under fire the first day of battle and operating on the island until it was secured, Capt. Walter Alford's 4th DUKW had not a single man killed but a number wounded though his company lost 16 DUKWs.

The DUKW further proved its value with Marine forces at Okinawa. Heavy rains made the island a quagmire at times. Loading in rear areas, the hybrids then proceeded by sea to deliver needs to frontline units. Crews not only braved enemy shells and sea delivering means of war to forward units, DUKWs from Second DUKW evacuated a unit trapped behind enemy lines. The company's personnel may have been the first Marine ground force unit to wear armored vests in combat--Army Air Corps flak jackets on Okinawa.


Today, DUKWs survive, offering tourists rides in a surprising number of locales, for example, Baltimore's Ride the Ducks. Ride the Ducks deserves recognition for another reason:
Ride The Ducks Vehicles and Hurricane Katrina


Our vehicles are not only the best and most proven design for amphibious sightseeing, but they have also proved worthy in rescue missions. Ride The Ducks was the only amphibious tour operator/manufacturer to support the rescue and evacuation efforts in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. We immediately volunteered equipment, crew, and other resources in order to help evacuate hundreds of residents of the hardest-hit areas. Our team of volunteers was deemed "invaluable" by many involved in the rescue effort as our ducks were able to safely access and remove large numbers of people from areas inaccessible by other means. Not since Normandy have we been so proud of our Ducks-and our people.
Which proves that you can teach old DUKWs new tricks.


Offer up a salute to these "swimming trucks" and their crews!

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Gasoline Prices


From www.chartoftheday.com
Today, the price of a barrel of crude oil closed just shy of the $110 level as geopolitical tensions continue and oil suppliers struggle to keep up with demand. With oil prices rising, it is not all that surprising to find that gasoline prices are following suit. Over the past six months, the average US price for a gallon of unleaded has risen 51 cents per gallon. When adjusted for inflation, gasoline prices are at 27-year highs and within 2% of the inflation-adjusted peak of 1981.
According to this article, soem experts predict gas prices may fall. Or not:
Crude oil may fall this week as imports increase and US refiners operate at below-average rates, bolstering inventories.

Fifteen of 28 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News, or 54 per cent, said prices will drop through April 18. Eleven of the respondents, or 39 per cent, said futures will rise and two forecast that prices will be little changed.

A week ago, 47 per cent said oil would decline.
***
This is the 14th straight week that analysts have forecast a decline in prices. The oil survey has correctly predicted the direction of prices 50 per cent of the time since its introduction in April 2004.
You can achieve the same level of accuracy by flipping a coin...

Platt's notices a "disconnect" between gasoline prices and crude oil supply in a podcast here.

Friday, April 11, 2008

French grab Somali pirates - after cruise yacht hostages freed

with a big hat tip to Galrahn, who caught this while I was otherwise occupied, reported as French commandos swoop after pirates free hostages:
French commandos seized six pirates in Somalia on Friday during a daring helicopter raid launched shortly after the bandits had released the 30-strong crew of a luxury yacht hijacked last week.

French officials said the owners of the yacht paid a ransom to obtain the freedom of the crew and as soon as it was clear that they were all safe, the commandos went into action aboard helicopters to track down the pirates.
***
Georgelin said the French military tracked the pirates, believed to be Somali fishermen, after they made landfall and moved in when they saw some of the gang getting away in a car.

A sniper in one helicopter shot out the car engine while another helicopter dropped off three French soldiers who captured the six pirates and hauled them off to French navy helicopter carrier waiting off the Somali coast.
***
Georgelin said no public money was paid to free the hostages but he indicated that the ships owner had paid a ransom, part of which was found with the escaping pirates.

"When we captured the pirates we also recovered some interesting bags," he said.
***
French officials said the pirates would be tried in France. They said Paris would also seek much tougher United Nations action against maritime piracy.

Piracy is lucrative off lawless Somalia and most kidnappers treat their captives well in anticipation of a good ransom.

France said it would present new anti-piracy measures to fellow members of the United Nations Security Council next week aimed at toughening the war against sea banditry.

"This phenomenon is increasing, with the pirates becoming ever better equipped and organized," said Jean-David Levitte, Sarkozy's chief diplomatic advisor.

"We are confronted by a real, real threat," he said, adding that over the last 10 years 3,200 sailors had been kidnapped by pirates, 500 injured and 160 killed.
Unlike the situation with the U.S. Navy in other situations involving these pirates, the captured ship was French ship with a largely French crew. Under those circumstances, it is my opinion that the French had more freedom of action than the U.S. or other navies would have had.

UPDATE: Interesting first report jumble here:
Local witnesses said an unknown number of people were killed by the rocket fire, which also destroyed three vehicles.

"I could see clouds of smoke as six helicopters were bombing the pirates. The pirates were also firing anti-aircraft machine guns in reaction. I cannot tell the exact casualties," witness Mohamed Ibrahim told Reuters by radio telephone.

The district commissioner of Garaad, where the attack took place, said the helicopters landed and troops jumped out to grab members of a group of 14 pirates who had just come ashore where three pickup trucks with heavy weapons were waiting.

"Local residents came out to the see the helicopters on the ground. The helicopters took off and fired rockets on the vehicles and the residents there, killing five local people," Commissioner Abdiaziz Olu-Yusuf Mohamed told Reuters by phone.

In Paris, French officials said that the operation was conducted with minimal use of force for fear of causing collateral damage.

They said a Gazelle helicopter with a sniper on board and a Panther helicopter with three commandos on board were involved in the incident. In addition two more missile-armed Gazelle helicopters stood by in support but did not intervene.

They said the only shot fired was by the sniper to disable the engine of a vehicle containing the pirates.

"No shots were fired directly at the pirates," Jean-Louis Georgelin, chief of the armed forces general staff, told a news conference.

"The shot from the first Gazelle was enough to stop the vehicle and get out the pirates, who gave themselves up without too much difficulty," he said.
Whatever.

Persian Gulf: Warning Flare


It was not, apparently, as some sources have it, warning shots (see here), but rather a "warning flare" - reported here
A Navy patrol ship in the Persian Gulf fired a flare to warn off three approaching high-speed boats late Thursday, the Navy said, and although a Navy spokesman said the boats were unidentified, U.S. news agencies reported they were Iranian.

The coastal patrol ship Typhoon was in the central Persian Gulf on its way north when it encountered the three boats, said Lt. Nathan Christensen, a spokesman for 5th Fleet in Bahrain. The Typhoon’s crew made what Christensen called “standard queries” over the bridge-to-bridge marine radio, warned the ships to stay away, and then fired the flare. As the Typhoon continued its transit, the three boats fell behind out of sight, he said.

Somalia: Pirates Release Yacht Hostages


Somali pirates release cruise yacht hostages, as reported here:
The 30 hostages held on a tourist yacht by pirates off the coast of Somalia have been released, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Friday.

A statement from Sarkozy's office said he had thanked the French army and other French agencies "that allowed a quick end" to the hostage-taking.

The statement did not elaborate on the role of the French military but said the release occurred "without incident."

Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said France would organize the hostages' return "as soon as possible" and was welcoming the "happy ending" to the standoff.
More info from here:
The foreign ministry said the crew, 22 of whom were French, would be repatriated as soon as possible.

The Philippine foreign ministry said some of the crew were Filipinos and that all were safe.

"They are still on the boat, but the plan is for them to sail to Djibouti and from there, they will be airlifted to Paris," Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Esteban Conejos told Reuters in Manila.

"We were told the French Navy was escorting the yacht to safety. We hope the Filipinos could be reunited with their families by next week."
More news is expected later in the day.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Short Sea Shipping: Using Ships to Ease Highway Strain


The Baltimore Sun suggests a way around highway shipping woes - by using ships in "Put ship in shipping":
When it comes to transportation planning, we need a detour from the usual remedy of building highways - a detour that removes traffic from the roads altogether and onto one of our most under-utilized transportation resources: the sea.

The incidents in Minneapolis and Philadelphia illustrate the fragility of our nation's interstate highway system and its vulnerability to disruption by terrorist attack, natural disaster or collapse from overuse and lack of maintenance. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) rates over 25 percent of our country's 599,893 bridges as either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.

This situation threatens the daily commute of millions of Americans and the constant flow of goods upon which our just-in-time economy depends. And growing traffic volumes will add further strain on our interstate highway system. According to forecasts, U.S. freight tonnage will increase by 70 percent between 1998 and 2020, with trucks handling most of the increase.


Expanding the highway system to accommodate more traffic is expensive. The ASCE estimates that improving the nation's surface transportation infrastructure would require $155.5 billion annually. Contrast this with the Federal Highway Administration's budget of $40.1 billion for fiscal year 2009. We simply have not allocated sufficient resources to pave our way out of this challenge.


Fortunately, America has another, now virtually unused medium of transport. For interstate highways paralleling our shores, coastal shipping offers us a splendid alternative and a great entrepreneurial opportunity.


Marine highways do not need periodic resurfacing or massive land acquisition for expansion. They only require relatively small investments at each port terminal. Increased coastal shipping would also provide a new resilience to our transportation network, thereby contributing to national security.


Moreover, an alternative transport mode for heavy trucks would slow the aging process of the interstate highway system. According to a Federal Highway Administration study, trucks were responsible for 40 percent of the agency's program costs while accounting for less than 10 percent of total vehicle miles traveled. We must extend the useful life of our interstate highways as long as possible.


We might begin simply by putting trucks on ships. The shipping industry already builds vessels for that purpose, and the shore facilities for such ships are relatively simple and cheap. Trucking companies, struggling with the shortage of drivers, should welcome the opportunity to move long-haul trailers from one port to another. And they too would be pleased with less congestion on the coastal interstates.


The new marine medium would be a source of new jobs, both at sea and on shore. Furthermore, studies have shown that ships have the potential to carry three times more cargo per unit of energy consumed than trucks do. Thus they can cut transport costs and lower prices across the market, with benefit to both producer and consumer.


And, it gets better: New "green" propulsion systems, such as marine engines fueled by compressed natural gas, offer even lower emissions and better air quality. No more choking on diesel fumes; everyone benefits.

I don't see anything about the costs of developing our ports to handle more traffic, the need for more ships, crews and other maritime infrastructure and the need for drivers to get the trucks on and off the ships to their destinations. And I could quibble about how many of the 150,000 deteriorating bridges are on the heavily traveled East Coast corridor, but I won't.

It is an idea, however, when its true costs are developed and recognized, should be looked into.

In fact, it already has been. The topic of the Sun piece is known as "Short Sea Shipping" - which the United States Maritime Administration (MARAD) says is:
Short Sea Shipping is defined as commercial waterborne transportation that does not transit an ocean. It is an alternative form of commercial transportation that utilizes inland and coastal waterways to move commercial freight from major domestic ports to its destination.
For those interested in reducing the East Coast land transport woes along Interstate 95, which is the main north-south traffic artery, MARAD has a pdf available from the "I-95 Corridor Coalition" titled "Short-Sea and Coastal Shipping Options Study" here. Dated 2005, it contains some useful information that would support many of the goals set out in the Sun piece, but also a few concerns:
Existing infrastructure may not be capable of handling large volumes of short-sea
traffic. There are two infrastructure issues that interviewees mentioned. The first is the condition of the U.S. inland and coastal waterway systems, which have not been
maintained effectively over the last several years. In many cases, the waterway infrastructure (locks/dams, channels, bridge clearances) is not robust enough to handle commercial traffic. This results in somewhat of a “Catch-22” situation: it is unlikely that major investments to maintain or improve the coastal/inland waterway infrastructure will be made until there is sufficient commercial traffic; and commercial users are not likely to consider short-sea/coastal shipping as a viable option until the system is improved (and can provide some degree of transit time reliability). The other infrastructure issue is the condition of existing port and terminal infrastructure. Many of the under-utilized ports that would benefit from increased short-sea shipping operations do not have sufficient infrastructure (berths, cranes, access) to support efficient short-sea shipping; the ports that do have that kind of infrastructure are typically larger, load center ports that already are nearing capacity and that often give preference to larger, oceangoing, international container ships.
***
There is a shortage of vessels suitable for use in short-sea trade. Due in part to the requirements of the Jones Act, many interviewees indicated that there is a lack of vessels that are appropriate for use in short-sea operations. Many interviewees stated that high-speed vessels (capable of attaining speeds of 25 to 30 knots) are necessary to support short-sea shipping operations. These vessels are expensive to construct and maintain, requiring a long-term commitment by shippers who would use a short-sea service. This results in another “Catch-22” situation: shippers often do not want to commit to the service until a vessel is constructed that can support it and operators often do not want to invest in new ships unless they have long-term commitments from shippers.
MARAD has more here, including a PowerPoint presentation. An organization (lobby group) named the "Short Sea Shipping Cooperative" has a website extolling the virtues of - no surprise- Short Sea Shipping and including links to studies (take a look at the funding) on Short Sea Shipping, including one from USMMA profs here, University of New Orleans (UNO) study here.

Many companies are already in the inland container barge business, as set out here in a press release from 205:
Osprey Line, LLC, ("Osprey Line") announced today that it recently completed the largest single unit tow container movement in the history of the U.S. Inland Waterway System. The 15 barge tow was loaded with 375 containers (750 t.e.u.¹s) of agricultural products from Memphis to New Orleans and Houston. Osprey Line worked closely with six major steamship lines to move the cargo to Gulf of Mexico ports for export on container vessels. The volume transported is the equivalent of some ocean going vessels in the container trade, and several times larger than the majority of vessels employed in the short sea shipping trade in Europe.

"This voyage is an illustration of what we are accomplishing here at Osprey Line. The service is a great alternative to truck and rail on routes along the inland waterway system and the Gulf of Mexico. The U.S. Inland waterway system is an amazing resource that can readily be used to alleviate congestion along existing rail and highway corridors. When you combine Osprey Line¹s inland service with our Gulf of Mexico service, we provide an all-water system extending from the heartland of the United States to ports such as New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Houston, and Tampa. With partners like Kirby Corporation and Cooper T. Smith, we have the resources to respond to projects such as this container move and provide consistent reliable service."
MARAD site devoted to encouraging use of inland waterways for "intermodal" transport here.
Moving containers by barge is seen as an alternative to the growing congestion being experienced by landside modes and a freight capacity shortage. It is also cited for it environmental advantages and the potential cost savings for shippers. C-O-B could fill a niche market in the transport of containers that are not time-sensitive, containers that exceed highway weight limits, and repositioning/prepositioning of empty containers.
There are a lot of potential upsides. However, as the UNO study stated in 2004:
Extensive recent studies conducted by the maritime industry and research institutions find that the Short Sea operations, based on deployment of Ferries to carry domestic trailers and international containers, should provide a significant impact on the formation of an effective intermodal system. Such a system would relieve congestion and decrease the number of heavy trucks on coastal highways. It also improves safety, air, noise, and other environmental consequences of land based transportation modes, creates a modern U.S. fleet reserve and cadres of seafarers for military and other emergencies.

Implementation in the United States of these promising maritime services, however, faces a number of financial, regulatory, and marketing problems. Unless these problems are resolved, a viable maritime system would have serious difficulties in being effective. Viability of the Short Sea services, to a large extent, is beyond only direct financial savings, but also includes a variety of external benefits in comparison with other modes of transportation. The issue here is that in the planning and actual implementation of the system the industry, as of today, does not receive any credit for generated external benefits.
Map image is from UNO report.