Gun Free Zones are hunting preserves for innocent people.If you decide you aren't interested in being part of that preserve, then what kind of weapon do you need to stop a bad guy? Not much, really. You could use a cross bow, but the damn things are hard to conceal.
There are all sorts of lists of nice concealed pistols out there. My suggestion is that you get something that will fire a shot filled round in addition to regular ammo. Why? Makes it harder to miss the bad guy and makes it harder for a stray round to take out a fellow innocent.
Interesting discussion of self-defense shot rounds suitable for use in a pistol at NRA/American Rifleman:
The most efficient handgun for shooting .410 shells would have a smooth-bore barrel sized to fit that shell only. However, sawed-off shotguns and smooth-bore pistols have been restricted in this country for some time due to NFA regulations established in 1934. In order for a handgun to qualify for over-the-counter sale without additional Federal tax stamps and paperwork, it must have a rifled barrel and be chambered for a center-fire cartridge intended for handguns or rifles.See the handy info from 410Handguns.com here, which serves to point out that shot shells are a mostly a close up and personal thing. Then again, personal defense is all about up close.
Info on the Smith & Wesson Governor, one of those .410/.45 combos here:
The Smith & Wesson Governor revolver puts six rounds of customizable response under your control. Load with .410 2 1/2" shotshells, .45 ACP or .45 Colt - alone or in combination - and hit your target in every situation.Training also helps.
That's where you learn the kind of gun control that matters.
UPDATE: See Top Cops Warm to Idea of Armed Citizenry to Confront Terrorists:
Oakland University criminal justice professor Daniel Kennedy couldn't agree more. He told the Detroit News that terrorists would be reluctant to attack armed citizens.Which is a cowed population willing to accept anything to stop the terrorists, including meekly surrendering.
“We don’t have laboratories where we can test these theories, but there is something to the argument that terrorists want a high body count — and if they can only shoot a few people before they’re taken out themselves, it wouldn’t have the kind of impact they want.”
Saying that terrorists would be reluctant to attack armed.... is not quite right. They do it just about everyday in Jihadistan because for them, it is but a brief stop on the way to Paradise. They know they're going to die. It's not reluctance to face armed enemies that deters them or makes them attack soft targets. Their attacks are motivated by the NEED to cause TERROR. Look at Beslan and other attacks/bombings. It didn't matter who was killed. The object was to terrorize in line with the terror doctrine out of the 60's. Force the state to repress even more of their fellows who will then lash back at the state in a vicious cycle.ReplyDelete
You are right to a point. That point being that a group that is ready, willing and able to fight back is not, almost by definition, a terrorized and cowed group.Delete
Terror is a state of mind that admits helplessness and hopelessness against an enemy who, as you indicate, is more than willing to die in his cause.
But if an armed citizenry has the power and will to fight back then it is unlikely they are subject to that terror that causes paralysis.
As far as repression of their fellows, it seems that is preventable if the non-jihadist majority would assist in identifying those who are disinclined to practice peaceful co-existence.